양희현 Yang Heehyun , 어성욱 Oa Seongwook , 정찬묵 Jung Chanmook , 노시현 Roh Seehyun
DOI: Vol.31(No.3) 25-47, 2024
Abstract
This paper examines cases How Korea National Railway Held a Contract Review Committee, the outcomes of lawsuits involving the Korea National Railway, court precedents, and legislative attempts by the National Assembly. It identifies issues related to extended sanctions and proposes improvement measures. Extended sanctions refer to the expansion of sanctions against disqualified contractors by one ordering agency to the entire central government, local governments, and public institutions. However, specific details regarding this are not stipulated in the “Act on the Management of Public Institutions,” leading to ongoing disputes between public institutions and enterprises. The 21st National Assembly attempted to codify extended sanctions in the “Act on the Management of Public Institutions” and the “Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party” but the legislative attempt failed due to concerns about over legislation. Considering the opposition from the National Assembly, changes in economic conditions, and the outcomes of lawsuits involving the Korea National Railway, it is necessary to amend relevant laws to prohibit extended sanctions.
Key Words
확장제재, 입찰참가자격 제한제도, 공공기관, Expanded Sanctions, Bidder Qualification Restriction System, Public Institutions